by Ronald E. Keener
Vision for Ministry
The Most Compelling Money-Raiser
By Ronald E. Keener
Choosing
fund-raising counsel is one of the most important decisions of a church’s
campaign when raising funds for a campus expansion. This month, in the third of
a six-part series of interviews, Church Business® spoke
with Ron Hayden, executive director of Tucson, Ariz.-based Callahan Stewardship
Resources, in strategic alliance with Stewardship Coaching Service (of which
Hayden is president).
A senior pastor for 23 years, Hayden has worked in ministry
development for an additional 13 years, during which he estimates he has
traveled 2 million miles and worked with 100 ministry organizations and 50
capital campaigns.
Ronald E. Keener: With regards to issues of unity, vision,
organization or polity that say, ‘Stop! Now’s not the time to have a
campaign!’ what inner voice on a campaign should the pastor and leaders be
listening to?
Ron Hayden: ‘Red lights’ exist
when the vision is questionable, or if there’s lack of clarity, insufficient
resources and serious unresolved issues. This is an unfriendly environment from
which to reach maximum ultimate support. Good campaigns always begin with an
accurate reading of the congregation; the leadership must be on the same note on
the same page of music. The people must be prepared for the campaign’s purpose
and process. Frequently asked questions must be discovered and answered
thoroughly and correctly. Do the people trust the leadership and the church’s
handling of finances?
The internal readiness of the church should be tested — what
are the prospects for staffing the campaign, and who are the potential leaders?
Will there be enough volunteers for the teams? What’s the potential funding
capability compared to the cost of the project? Are the people enthusiastic? Are the influential members outside the elected or hired
leaders being used? Unfortunately, church capital campaigns are prematurely
launched all too often.
REK: What’s the ideal internal climate or congregational
environment for a campus expansion?
RH: There are components that
comprise a “friendly fund-raising environment” for expansion support: (1)
great vision-casting that enables the church family to imagine how the expansion
project will advance ministry in the lives of people; (2) strong understanding
of the project and how it will help to better deliver the mission of the church;
and (3) the people believe that the overall finance plan for the project is
prudent and doable.
REK: Give a couple of examples — from your experience — of
different kinds of churches or projects who raised expansion funds, and how
those campaigns went in terms of vision, goals met and missions extended.
RH: ‘Beyond Belief’ was the
campaign theme in 2004 that energized the members of Sun Valley Community Church
in Gilbert, Ariz., to make sacrificial gifts for increasing ministry impact
through campus expansion.
The approved budget for 2004 was $771,000, and the campaign
pledges are $1.3 million and rising. General fund giving during 2004 continued
to increase — even during the campaign — resulting in giving that exceeded
the budget by $130,000. Because of the campaign, financing is already in place
to begin construction of the second building on their 9.15-acre campus. The
building will be more than 50,000 square feet with fully equipped children’s
area, larger worship center, chapel and additional classrooms and administrative
space.
In a second example, Mountain Valley Community Church in
Scottsdale, Ariz., entered into a capital-gifts campaign to ‘obtain [its] own
home’ — heretofore existing in borrowed, rented or leased facilities. Still,
the weekly attendance grew to 1,000 and the budget to $1 million. It became
clear to church leaders that they had to move
forward in faith to establish the foundation for relocation.
The campaign concluded with a Worship Extravaganza on the
church’s tenth anniversary, when campaign commitments were received as an act
of worship in the spirit of unity. More than $2.4 million has been committed,
enabling the church to complete a finance plan to purchase a prime north-
Scottsdale location. On Labor Day weekend last year, Mountain Valley held its
first service in their very own home.
REK: When should a church turn to a professional fund-raiser,
and when should they do it themselves?
RH: There have been many churches
who’ve had successful self-directed campaigns, but they’re the exception and
not the rule and are probably the result of special circumstances not available
to most churches.
The purpose of a capital campaign is to communicate the vision
for ministry expansion in the most compelling way possible. This is a complex
communication process for four reasons: First, capital campaigns seek to raise
large sums of money, so you’ll find people are more attentive to the process
than usual.
Second, people are being asked to pledge above and beyond
their present giving for a relatively long period of time — usually three
years. Third, the very nature of significant expansion fosters greater scrutiny
of the decision-making process.
Fourth, and most important, a capital campaign is primarily a
special form of high-touch, grassroots communication conducted in a personal
environment.
Key messages are designed to align the church family around
strategic ministry clarity through repetition, simplicity and multiple mediums.
Many communication experts believe that only after hearing a message six or
seven times does a person begin to internalize it.
People will sacrificially support only what they know and
understand.
Even though Solomon was chosen by God to build the Temple, God
gave David the responsibility for the great work of raising the resources
because Solomon was ‘still young and inexperienced’ (I Chronicles 29:1).
There’s great value in securing the services of someone who’s experienced in
capital stewardship campaigns to guide your church through this unique process.
The top 10 benefits of hiring a campaign consultant or coach
are: (1) support for the pastor and staff; (2) help in creating relevant
initiatives; (3) broad experience, knowledge and judgment; (4) a step-by-step
campaign plan tailored to the church; (5) an unbiased and independent perspective; (6) undivided
attention; (7) innovation and new ideas; (8) a catalyst for growth; (9) supplement of needed skills and
management; and (10) accountability.
REK: Is there a cost benefit for churches to direct their own
programs?
RH: Very seldom. It’s generally
accepted that self-directed church campaigns will raise about one-third of the
potential support. Therefore, the cost benefit to securing the ministry service
of someone who’s experienced is substantial.
REK: What does a fund-raiser look for in a church’s
readiness to engage in a campaign?
RH: I refer to this testing of the
congregation as ‘stewardship preparation.’ The results will sometimes tell
the church leadership to slow down enough to allow the hearts and minds of the
people to catch up with the hearts and minds of the leaders. The campaign itself
can help align the congregation with the leadership but can’t be perceived as
an alignment ‘cure-all.’ REK: What character and
personal traits do you look for in the pastor of a church entering a campaign?
RH: A campaign will be more
successful if the pastor is engaged enough to serve as a personal example for
campaign-process support and sacrificial giving. Generally, this means at least
five things: (1) hands-on involvement with campaignleadership recruitment; (2)
attendance at selected key campaign team meetings; (3) sharing his personal
commitment to the vision; (4) providing relational influence with selected key
gifts; and (5) vision casting. The pastor’s involvement is best determined on
a case-by-case basis, taking into account the unique context of the church and
the pastor’s leadership priorities.
REK:What expectations might a church have for building or
raising the funds that are common to churches of any size?
RH: Depending on the nature of the
project and the size and number of major gifts, a general guideline for church
campaigns is that a church will raise 1.5 to three times its annual budget over
a three-year giving period. It’s also helpful to create a Summary of Needs
designed to communicate the number and size of gifts needed to reach the goal.
It should be done on a churchby- church basis, with the pertinent financial
information of the particular congregation.
However, the Summary of Needs ‘model’ begins with accepted
rules of thumb: first, that 30 percent of the total campaign commitments should
be expected from less than 10 percent of the regular donors, with the single
highest gift accounting for 10 percent of the campaign goal. Ninety percent of
the campaign gifts usually will come from about 50 percent of the active donors
(i.e., households that give
$100 or more in a year).
REK: Is there a formula or ratio that churches need to
consider between total project costs, borrowing required and campaign goals?
RH: The rule of thumb often
presented by financial professionals is that a church can design a project
finance plan equal to four to five times the current annual giving. The finance
plan normally would be a combination of a capital campaign(s) and prudent
long-term debt.
Churches with sizable reserve funds, the ability to raise
three times or more the current annual giving, and the willingness to borrow
three to four times or more the current annual giving often exceed the accepted
rules of thumb.
REK: Any final cautions or recommendations for a church
raising capital funds?
RH: Pastors should not be timid
about the subject of money. 2 Corinthians 8-9 records
the principles established by Paul for collecting money from the Gentile
churches in aiding the poor believers in Jerusalem. Paul made sure the
Corinthians knew the truth about money and giving.
Today, thorough teaching on true biblical stewardship is a
neglected subject. Pastors often shy away from preaching about money. Even
though stewardship relates to more than economics, believers can’t be good
stewards if they don’t know and practice God’s wisdom about money: how to
get it, spend it, save it, invest it, borrow it and give it.
When we teach about giving, we must not see ourselves as
beggars standing on a corner with a tin cup, but as those who are following the
Lord’s example of connecting God’s people to God’s work by staffing and
funding Kingdom enterprises. The most successful capital campaigns are built on
a platform of foundational truths about stewardship that are understood before
the campaign ever begins.
Conduct a campaign that is ‘truly tailored’ to your
church. Every church and ministry is unique; a ‘canned’
process will more than likely cause irritation at one or more points. Engage a
professional who has the ability and time necessary to understand how you do
ministry and can help to structure a process that looks like your church, sounds
like your church, and feels like your church.
Avoid a premature launch of the campaign. The
people must be prepared for the campaign’s purpose and process.
Ronald E. Keener writes from Mesa, Ariz., where he follows
faith issues for the church in society and culture, church renewal and growth,
and leadership and management. He is the former editor of Christian
Management Report. Contact Keener at
HealthyChurches@hotmail.com.
|